IPSP · Rethinking Society for the 21st Century
  • About
    • Aim
      • Reducing complexity, priorizing actions
      • Advancing proposals for systemic transformation
      • Building coalitions of actors
    • Scope
      • Environment
      • Social cohesion
      • Governance
      • Technology
      • Conflicts and violence
    • Process
      • Knowledge action space
      • Political action space
    • Code of Ethics
  • Activities
    • Working groups
      • Drivers for systemic transformations
      • Measuring what we value
      • Living wage
      • Inspiring behavioral change
      • Information as a public good
      • Steering technological change
      • Towards a regenerative democracy
      • Ecological rule of law
      • Extractivism and its impacts
      • Global solidarity and global citizenship
      • Health and wellbeing
    • Reports
    • Platform
    • Events
      • Paris Meeting October 2024
  • People
    • Honorary Committee
    • Board of Directors
    • Executive
    • Advisory Board
    • Contributors Network
  • Partners
    • How to become a partner ?
      • Academia
      • Civil society
      • International organizations
      • Philanthropy
      • Crowdfunding
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Video
    • Media
    • Useful links
  • News
  • IPSP 1 (2014-2019)
    • About IPSP 1
      • Aim – IPSP1
      • Scope IPSP 1
      • Process IPSP 1
    • People
      • Honorary Advisory Committee
      • Steering Committee
      • Scientific Council
      • Authors
      • Associate Members
      • Secretariat
    • Partners IPSP1
  • Connect
Select Page

What is a just society? 3 – How much priority for the worse off?

by IPSP | Jul 7, 2016 | Forum | 0 comments

Opening Statement

  1. Avatar
    IPSP on July 7, 2016 at 9:57 am

    Philosophers disagree about what makes a society just or unjust. Is it a matter of freedom, equality, status, resources, happiness, opportunities, dignity, recognition…?

    Here is one “hot” question about characterizing social justice:

    • How much priority should we give to the disadvantaged members of society?

    The philosophers disagree: John Rawls famously argued that we should give absolute priority to the worst-off; Friedrich Nietsche preferred to favor the most successful; in between, Jeremy Bentham proposed to look at total welfare rather than care about the distribution; Robert Nozick argued that inequalities do not matter provided everyone’s basic freedoms are guaranteed.

    This is an important question, not just for philosophers. How much social welfare provision, how much government taxation, how much encouragement to charities should we have: all of these questions depend on the relative importance of helping the worse off.

    It is not just a political question, it is primarily a moral question: do we feel a special concern for the worse off, and should we organize society to express such a special concern?

    Bring your voice to this forum and share your own perspective on social justice!

Please log in or register to add a reply.

Langage (click on the globe)

IPSP Newsletter (coming soon)

Please check your inbox and confirm the subscription.

Contact us

Mail : exec-secretariat@ipsp.org
LinkedIn
Youtube
Facebook

Office

Institute for Advanced Studies in Paris
c/o IEA de Paris
17 quai d’Anjou, 75004 Paris, France

  • Facebook
  • X
  • RSS

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress